Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

North Dakota Case Commentaries

Fixed-Fraction NPRIs Are Calculated on the Entire Described Tract—Even Where Part Lies Below the Missouri River’s OHWM: Commentary on Garaas v. Continental Resources, 2025 ND 146

Fixed-Fraction NPRIs Are Calculated on the Entire Described Tract—Even Where Part Lies Below the Missouri River’s OHWM: Commentary on Garaas v. Continental Resources, 2025 ND 146

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Fixed-Fraction NPRIs Are Calculated on the Entire Described Tract—Even Where Part Lies Below the Missouri River’s OHWM: Commentary on Garaas v. Continental Resources, 2025 ND 146 Introduction In...
Juliuson v. Johnson: Waiver Can Defeat Lease Renewal Options; Specific Performance Requires Proven Breach; Bad‑Faith Tort Remains Insurance‑Only

Juliuson v. Johnson: Waiver Can Defeat Lease Renewal Options; Specific Performance Requires Proven Breach; Bad‑Faith Tort Remains Insurance‑Only

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Juliuson v. Johnson: Waiver Can Defeat Lease Renewal Options; Specific Performance Requires Proven Breach; Bad‑Faith Tort Remains Insurance‑Only Introduction In Juliuson v. Johnson, 2025 ND 139, the...
Facial Physical‑Takings Claims Accrue Upon Implementation, Not Enactment: ND Supreme Court Clarifies Standing and Jurisdiction in CO2 Pore‑Space Amalgamation

Facial Physical‑Takings Claims Accrue Upon Implementation, Not Enactment: ND Supreme Court Clarifies Standing and Jurisdiction in CO2 Pore‑Space Amalgamation

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Facial Physical‑Takings Claims Accrue Upon Implementation, Not Enactment: North Dakota Supreme Court Clarifies Standing and Jurisdiction in CO2 Pore‑Space Amalgamation Introduction In Northwest...
“Prima Facie or Nothing”: Carvalho v. Carvalho and the North Dakota Supreme Court’s Clarification of Custody-Modification Standards

“Prima Facie or Nothing”: Carvalho v. Carvalho and the North Dakota Supreme Court’s Clarification of Custody-Modification Standards

Date: Aug 27, 2025
“Prima Facie or Nothing”: Carvalho v. Carvalho and the North Dakota Supreme Court’s Clarification of Custody-Modification Standards Introduction Carvalho v. Carvalho, 2025 ND 129, emerges from a...
State v. Hendricks: Affirmative Conduct as “Child Neglect” Absent Injury—North Dakota Supreme Court Clarifies the Abuse/Neglect Divide

State v. Hendricks: Affirmative Conduct as “Child Neglect” Absent Injury—North Dakota Supreme Court Clarifies the Abuse/Neglect Divide

Date: Aug 19, 2025
State v. Hendricks: Affirmative Conduct as “Child Neglect” Absent Injury—North Dakota Supreme Court Clarifies the Abuse/Neglect Divide Introduction State v. Hendricks, 2025 ND 143, presented the...
Boundary Lines Re-Drawn: Juliuson v. Johnson and the Limits of Good-Faith Claims Beyond Insurance Contracts

Boundary Lines Re-Drawn: Juliuson v. Johnson and the Limits of Good-Faith Claims Beyond Insurance Contracts

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Boundary Lines Re-Drawn: Juliuson v. Johnson and the Limits of Good-Faith Claims Beyond Insurance Contracts Introduction In Juliuson v. Johnson, 2025 ND 139, the North Dakota Supreme Court issued a...
Tamm v. Gatzke: Re-drawing the Lines – North Dakota Reins in Rule 12(c) and Re-affirms Fact-Intensive Nature of Express and Implied Easement Claims

Tamm v. Gatzke: Re-drawing the Lines – North Dakota Reins in Rule 12(c) and Re-affirms Fact-Intensive Nature of Express and Implied Easement Claims

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Tamm v. Gatzke: Re-drawing the Lines – North Dakota Reins in Rule 12(c) and Re-affirms Fact-Intensive Nature of Express and Implied Easement Claims Introduction Tamm v. Gatzke, 2025 ND 141, is the...
Clarity over Cocktails: North Dakota Supreme Court Refines the Vagueness Test for Non-Criminal Municipal Ordinances Governing Alcohol Service

Clarity over Cocktails: North Dakota Supreme Court Refines the Vagueness Test for Non-Criminal Municipal Ordinances Governing Alcohol Service

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Clarity over Cocktails: North Dakota Supreme Court Refines the Vagueness Test for Non-Criminal Municipal Ordinances Governing Alcohol Service Introduction In Liquid Hospitality, LLC d/b/a Windbreak...
“Granular Privilege Review” Mandated: Anne Carlsen Center v. LeFevre and the New North Dakota Specificity Standard in Discovery Orders

“Granular Privilege Review” Mandated: Anne Carlsen Center v. LeFevre and the New North Dakota Specificity Standard in Discovery Orders

Date: Aug 1, 2025
“Granular Privilege Review” Mandated: Anne Carlsen Center v. LeFevre and the New North Dakota Specificity Standard in Discovery Orders Introduction Anne Carlsen Center v. LeFevre, 2025 ND 142, is a...
“Hostility Requires Objective Acts” – Roth v. Meyer and the Refined Standard for Proving Adverse Possession in North Dakota

“Hostility Requires Objective Acts” – Roth v. Meyer and the Refined Standard for Proving Adverse Possession in North Dakota

Date: Aug 1, 2025
“Hostility Requires Objective Acts” – Roth v. Meyer and the Refined Standard for Proving Adverse Possession in North Dakota Introduction Roth v. Meyer, 2025 ND 116, is the North Dakota Supreme...
Rademacher v. State – North Dakota Supreme Court Clarifies the Evidentiary Burden for Post-Conviction Ineffective-Assistance Claims Involving Unobtained Expert Evaluations

Rademacher v. State – North Dakota Supreme Court Clarifies the Evidentiary Burden for Post-Conviction Ineffective-Assistance Claims Involving Unobtained Expert Evaluations

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Rademacher v. State – North Dakota Supreme Court Clarifies the Evidentiary Burden for Post-Conviction Ineffective-Assistance Claims Involving Unobtained Expert Evaluations Introduction Steven Charles...
Axvig v. Czajkowski: Contractual Notice Provisions as Mandatory Preconditions to Any Cancellation of a North Dakota Contract for Deed

Axvig v. Czajkowski: Contractual Notice Provisions as Mandatory Preconditions to Any Cancellation of a North Dakota Contract for Deed

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Axvig v. Czajkowski (2025 ND 135): Contractual Notice Provisions Are Mandatory Preconditions to Any Seller-Initiated Cancellation – Even When Proceeding by Court Action Introduction Court: Supreme...
Bang v. Continental Resources: Clarifying the Implied Right to Salt-Water Pipelines and Defining the Limits of Surface-Damage Claims in North Dakota

Bang v. Continental Resources: Clarifying the Implied Right to Salt-Water Pipelines and Defining the Limits of Surface-Damage Claims in North Dakota

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Bang v. Continental Resources: Clarifying the Implied Right to Salt-Water Pipelines and Defining the Limits of Surface-Damage Claims in North Dakota Introduction In Bang v. Continental Resources,...
The “Competent-Evidence Threshold” & Judicial Explanation Duty in Custody-Modification Motions – A Commentary on Carvalho v. Carvalho, 2025 ND 129

The “Competent-Evidence Threshold” & Judicial Explanation Duty in Custody-Modification Motions – A Commentary on Carvalho v. Carvalho, 2025 ND 129

Date: Jul 23, 2025
The “Competent-Evidence Threshold” & Judicial Explanation Duty in Custody-Modification Motions Comprehensive Commentary on Carvalho v. Carvalho, 2025 ND 129 1. Introduction Carvalho v. Carvalho (2025...
State v. Berkley: North Dakota Supreme Court Affirms Judicial Discretion in Child-Offender Registration

State v. Berkley: North Dakota Supreme Court Affirms Judicial Discretion in Child-Offender Registration

Date: Jul 23, 2025
State v. Berkley (2025 ND 134): Clarification of Judicial Discretion in Ordering Registration as an “Offender Against Children” 1. Introduction In State v. Berkley, 2025 ND 134, the North Dakota...
State v. Kennedy – Clarifying Invited Error and the Trial Court’s Limited Duty to Exclude Rule 404(b) Evidence Sua Sponte

State v. Kennedy – Clarifying Invited Error and the Trial Court’s Limited Duty to Exclude Rule 404(b) Evidence Sua Sponte

Date: Jul 23, 2025
State v. Kennedy – Clarifying Invited Error and the Trial Court’s Limited Duty to Exclude Rule 404(b) Evidence Sua Sponte Introduction State v. Kennedy, 2025 ND 130, presented the North Dakota...
State v. Solomon: Clarifying “Good Cause” and Implicit Barker Analysis under N.D.C.C. § 29-19-02

State v. Solomon: Clarifying “Good Cause” and Implicit Barker Analysis under N.D.C.C. § 29-19-02

Date: Jul 23, 2025
State v. Solomon: Clarifying “Good Cause” and Implicit Barker Analysis under N.D.C.C. § 29-19-02 Introduction In State v. Solomon, 2025 ND 133, the North Dakota Supreme Court was asked to decide...
Clarifying Personal Liability under N.D.C.C. § 65-04-26.1: No Penalties for Payroll-Report Failures, Yes to Prospective Accrual

Clarifying Personal Liability under N.D.C.C. § 65-04-26.1: No Penalties for Payroll-Report Failures, Yes to Prospective Accrual

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Clarifying Personal Liability under N.D.C.C. § 65-04-26.1: No Penalties for Payroll-Report Failures, Yes to Prospective Accrual Introduction In WSI v. Boechler, 2025 ND 132, the North Dakota Supreme...
Bazile v. State (2025 ND 128): Defining the Boundaries of “Pattern” Prosecutorial Misconduct, Newly-Discovered Evidence, and Res Judicata in North Dakota Post-Conviction Relief

Bazile v. State (2025 ND 128): Defining the Boundaries of “Pattern” Prosecutorial Misconduct, Newly-Discovered Evidence, and Res Judicata in North Dakota Post-Conviction Relief

Date: Jul 7, 2025
Bazile v. State (2025 ND 128): Defining the Boundaries of “Pattern” Prosecutorial Misconduct, Newly-Discovered Evidence, and Res Judicata in North Dakota Post-Conviction Relief Introduction Bazile v....
“Beyond the Wellhead” – The North Dakota Supreme Court Declares Salt-Water Gathering a Post-Production Cost Outside NDIC Adjudicatory Jurisdiction

“Beyond the Wellhead” – The North Dakota Supreme Court Declares Salt-Water Gathering a Post-Production Cost Outside NDIC Adjudicatory Jurisdiction

Date: Jul 7, 2025
“Beyond the Wellhead” – The North Dakota Supreme Court Declares Salt-Water Gathering a Post-Production Cost Outside NDIC Adjudicatory Jurisdiction Citation: Equinor Energy v. North Dakota Industrial...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert