Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

North Dakota Case Commentaries

MidFirst Bank v. Young: Mortgagors’ Lack of Standing to Challenge Mortgage Assignments and Limits on Restricting Access to Court Audio Recordings

MidFirst Bank v. Young: Mortgagors’ Lack of Standing to Challenge Mortgage Assignments and Limits on Restricting Access to Court Audio Recordings

Date: Dec 6, 2025
MidFirst Bank v. Young: Mortgagors’ Lack of Standing to Challenge Mortgage Assignments and Limits on Restricting Access to Court Audio Recordings I. Introduction The North Dakota Supreme Court’s...

    State v. Bell and the Unified Application of N.D.C.C. §§ 39‑20‑01 and 39‑20‑01.1
    in Serious-Injury and Fatal DUI Crash Investigations

State v. Bell and the Unified Application of N.D.C.C. §§ 39‑20‑01 and 39‑20‑01.1 in Serious-Injury and Fatal DUI Crash Investigations

Date: Dec 6, 2025
State v. Bell and the Unified Application of N.D.C.C. §§ 39‑20‑01 and 39‑20‑01.1 in Serious-Injury and Fatal DUI Crash Investigations I. Introduction State v. Bell, 2025 ND 201, is a significant...
State v. Martinez and the Discretionary Substitution of Jurors under N.D.R.Crim.P. 24(c)(1)

State v. Martinez and the Discretionary Substitution of Jurors under N.D.R.Crim.P. 24(c)(1)

Date: Dec 6, 2025
State v. Martinez and the Discretionary Substitution of Jurors under N.D.R.Crim.P. 24(c)(1) Introduction In State v. Martinez, 2025 ND 204, the North Dakota Supreme Court addressed an increasingly...
Facial Vagueness, Natural Rights, and the Four‑Vote Rule: Commentary on Access Independent Health Services, Inc. v. Wrigley, 2025 ND 199

Facial Vagueness, Natural Rights, and the Four‑Vote Rule: Commentary on Access Independent Health Services, Inc. v. Wrigley, 2025 ND 199

Date: Nov 23, 2025
Facial Vagueness, Natural Rights, and the Four‑Vote Rule: Commentary on Access Independent Health Services, Inc. v. Wrigley, 2025 ND 199 I. Introduction The North Dakota Supreme Court’s decision in...
Limits on Delegating Parenting Time Decisions to Therapists in North Dakota: Commentary on Boyda v. Boyda, 2025 ND 193

Limits on Delegating Parenting Time Decisions to Therapists in North Dakota: Commentary on Boyda v. Boyda, 2025 ND 193

Date: Nov 22, 2025
Limits on Delegating Parenting Time Decisions to Therapists in North Dakota: A Commentary on Boyda v. Boyda, 2025 ND 193 I. Introduction The North Dakota Supreme Court’s decision in Boyda v. Boyda,...
Domestic Violence Without Expiration: Clemenson v. Clemenson and the Scope of North Dakota’s Custody Presumption

Domestic Violence Without Expiration: Clemenson v. Clemenson and the Scope of North Dakota’s Custody Presumption

Date: Nov 22, 2025
Domestic Violence Without Expiration: Clemenson v. Clemenson and the Scope of North Dakota’s Custody Presumption I. Introduction In Clemenson v. Clemenson, 2025 ND 195, the North Dakota Supreme Court...
Isolated Parental DUI and Material Change in Circumstances in North Dakota Custody Law: Commentary on Johnson v. Staiger, 2025 ND 198

Isolated Parental DUI and Material Change in Circumstances in North Dakota Custody Law: Commentary on Johnson v. Staiger, 2025 ND 198

Date: Nov 22, 2025
Isolated Parental DUI and the “Material Change in Circumstances” Threshold in North Dakota Custody Law: A Comprehensive Commentary on Johnson v. Staiger, 2025 ND 198 I. Introduction Johnson v....
State v. Gores (2025 ND 194): Forcible Resistance, the Duty to Inform, and “Willful” Domestic Violence in North Dakota Law

State v. Gores (2025 ND 194): Forcible Resistance, the Duty to Inform, and “Willful” Domestic Violence in North Dakota Law

Date: Nov 22, 2025
State v. Gores (2025 ND 194): Forcible Resistance, the Duty to Inform, and “Willful” Domestic Violence in North Dakota Law I. Introduction In State v. Gores, 2025 ND 194, the North Dakota Supreme...
State v. Vetter: Defining “Tumultuous” Disorderly Conduct and Preserving Constitutional Claims Under N.D.C.C. § 12.1‑31‑01

State v. Vetter: Defining “Tumultuous” Disorderly Conduct and Preserving Constitutional Claims Under N.D.C.C. § 12.1‑31‑01

Date: Nov 22, 2025
State v. Vetter: Defining “Tumultuous” Disorderly Conduct and Preserving Constitutional Claims Under N.D.C.C. § 12.1‑31‑01 I. Introduction In State v. Vetter, 2025 ND 197, the North Dakota Supreme...
Silent Counts Are Illegal: Oral Pronouncement Required for Each Count at Probation Revocation; Collateral Challenges to Convictions Must Proceed via Postconviction Relief — Commentary on State v. Miller, 2025 ND 188

Silent Counts Are Illegal: Oral Pronouncement Required for Each Count at Probation Revocation; Collateral Challenges to Convictions Must Proceed via Postconviction Relief — Commentary on State v. Miller, 2025 ND 188

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Silent Counts Are Illegal: Oral Pronouncement Required for Each Count at Probation Revocation; Collateral Challenges to Convictions Must Proceed via Postconviction Relief — State v. Miller, 2025 ND...
IIED Claims Predicated on Medical Judgments Require Expert Affidavits; “Obvious Occurrence” Exception Does Not Reach Discharge and Pain‑Management Decisions — Commentary on McMahon v. Sanford, 2025 ND 184

IIED Claims Predicated on Medical Judgments Require Expert Affidavits; “Obvious Occurrence” Exception Does Not Reach Discharge and Pain‑Management Decisions — Commentary on McMahon v. Sanford, 2025 ND 184

Date: Nov 7, 2025
IIED Claims Predicated on Medical Judgments Require Expert Affidavits; “Obvious Occurrence” Exception Does Not Reach Discharge and Pain‑Management Decisions — Commentary on McMahon v. Sanford, 2025...
Smith v. State: No Per Se Strickland Prejudice from 404(b) Errors; Contextual Prejudice Analysis and Record Supplementation Required

Smith v. State: No Per Se Strickland Prejudice from 404(b) Errors; Contextual Prejudice Analysis and Record Supplementation Required

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Smith v. State: No Per Se Strickland Prejudice from 404(b) Errors; Contextual Prejudice Analysis and Record Supplementation Required Introduction In Smith v. State, 2025 ND 189 (N.D. Nov. 5, 2025),...
Playback of Evidence During Deliberations Must Occur in Open Court: Closure Violates the Public Trial Right — State v. Barrett, 2025 ND 186

Playback of Evidence During Deliberations Must Occur in Open Court: Closure Violates the Public Trial Right — State v. Barrett, 2025 ND 186

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Playback of Evidence During Deliberations Must Occur in Open Court: Closure Violates the Public Trial Right — State v. Barrett, 2025 ND 186 Introduction In State v. Barrett, 2025 ND 186, the North...
Consecutive Misdemeanor Sentences Permitted When Offenses Target Different Victims on Different Dates: State v. Cotton (2025 ND 191)

Consecutive Misdemeanor Sentences Permitted When Offenses Target Different Victims on Different Dates: State v. Cotton (2025 ND 191)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Consecutive Misdemeanor Sentences Permitted When Offenses Target Different Victims on Different Dates: State v. Cotton (2025 ND 191) Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota Date: November 5, 2025...
Parole Practices Cannot Create an Illegal Mandatory Minimum from Lawful Consecutive Sentences: A Commentary on State v. Wallette, 2025 ND 190

Parole Practices Cannot Create an Illegal Mandatory Minimum from Lawful Consecutive Sentences: A Commentary on State v. Wallette, 2025 ND 190

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Parole Practices Cannot Create an Illegal Mandatory Minimum from Lawful Consecutive Sentences: State v. Wallette, 2025 ND 190 Introduction In State v. Wallette, 2025 ND 190, the North Dakota Supreme...
State v. Watterud: Pattern Child-Testimony Can Sustain Multi-Year GSI Counts; Open-Court Playback During Deliberations Requires Proof of Actual Prejudice for Mistrial

State v. Watterud: Pattern Child-Testimony Can Sustain Multi-Year GSI Counts; Open-Court Playback During Deliberations Requires Proof of Actual Prejudice for Mistrial

Date: Nov 7, 2025
State v. Watterud: Pattern Child-Testimony Can Sustain Multi-Year GSI Counts; Open-Court Playback During Deliberations Requires Proof of Actual Prejudice for Mistrial Court: Supreme Court of North...
State v. Wilson: Calibrating Waiver-of-Counsel Advisements at Probation Revocation—No Sixth Amendment Right; Tailored Warnings Under Rule 32(f)(3)(A)(iii) Suffice

State v. Wilson: Calibrating Waiver-of-Counsel Advisements at Probation Revocation—No Sixth Amendment Right; Tailored Warnings Under Rule 32(f)(3)(A)(iii) Suffice

Date: Nov 7, 2025
State v. Wilson: Calibrating Waiver-of-Counsel Advisements at Probation Revocation—No Sixth Amendment Right; Tailored Warnings Under Rule 32(f)(3)(A)(iii) Suffice Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota...
Eviction After Statutory Contract‑for‑Deed Cancellation: North Dakota Affirms Posted Service and Strict Nonjoinability in Summary Proceedings — Cache Private Capital Diversified Fund v. Braddock (2025 ND 168)

Eviction After Statutory Contract‑for‑Deed Cancellation: North Dakota Affirms Posted Service and Strict Nonjoinability in Summary Proceedings — Cache Private Capital Diversified Fund v. Braddock (2025 ND 168)

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Eviction After Statutory Contract‑for‑Deed Cancellation: North Dakota Affirms Posted Service and Strict Nonjoinability in Summary Proceedings — Cache Private Capital Diversified Fund v. Braddock...
Serious Difficulty Controlling Behavior Proven by Treatment Refusal and Institutional Misconduct, with Expert Nexus; Negative Inference from Absent Independent Expert Affirmed

Serious Difficulty Controlling Behavior Proven by Treatment Refusal and Institutional Misconduct, with Expert Nexus; Negative Inference from Absent Independent Expert Affirmed

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Serious Difficulty Controlling Behavior Proven by Treatment Refusal and Institutional Misconduct, with Expert Nexus; Negative Inference from Absent Independent Expert Affirmed Introduction In...
State v. King (2025 ND 174): Clarifying the Dual “True Threat” Standard for Terrorizing and Cabining Overbreadth in As-Applied Challenges Under Obvious-Error Review

State v. King (2025 ND 174): Clarifying the Dual “True Threat” Standard for Terrorizing and Cabining Overbreadth in As-Applied Challenges Under Obvious-Error Review

Date: Oct 24, 2025
State v. King (2025 ND 174): Clarifying the Dual “True Threat” Standard for Terrorizing and Cabining Overbreadth in As-Applied Challenges Under Obvious-Error Review Introduction In State v. King,...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert