Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

North Dakota Case Commentaries

Pederson v. State (2026 ND 1): Summary Disposition Error When Ineffective-Assistance Claims Are Dismissed Without a State Motion and Without an Evidentiary Hearing

Pederson v. State (2026 ND 1): Summary Disposition Error When Ineffective-Assistance Claims Are Dismissed Without a State Motion and Without an Evidentiary Hearing

Date: Jan 17, 2026
Pederson v. State (2026 ND 1): Summary Disposition Error When Ineffective-Assistance Claims Are Dismissed Without a State Motion and Without an Evidentiary Hearing I. Introduction In Pederson v....
Mandate-Rule Remands and RUPA Default Winding Up: No Implied Override, No In-Kind Inventory Distribution

Mandate-Rule Remands and RUPA Default Winding Up: No Implied Override, No In-Kind Inventory Distribution

Date: Jan 17, 2026
Mandate-Rule Remands and RUPA Default Winding Up: No Implied Override, No In-Kind Inventory Distribution Case: Ziemann v. Grosz, 2026 ND 6 Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota Date: 2026-01-15 I....
State v. Krall (2026 ND 7): North Dakota Rejects “Exclude Every Reasonable Hypothesis of Innocence” Circumstantial-Evidence Jury Instructions

State v. Krall (2026 ND 7): North Dakota Rejects “Exclude Every Reasonable Hypothesis of Innocence” Circumstantial-Evidence Jury Instructions

Date: Jan 17, 2026
State v. Krall (2026 ND 7): North Dakota Rejects “Exclude Every Reasonable Hypothesis of Innocence” Circumstantial-Evidence Jury Instructions Introduction In State v. Krall, the Supreme Court of...
Weigel v. Albertson (2026 ND 4): Attorney-Disqualification Orders Are Not Immediately Appealable; Supervisory Review and Rule 1.7(a) Conflicts When Counsel Also Represents the Entity

Weigel v. Albertson (2026 ND 4): Attorney-Disqualification Orders Are Not Immediately Appealable; Supervisory Review and Rule 1.7(a) Conflicts When Counsel Also Represents the Entity

Date: Jan 17, 2026
Attorney-Disqualification Orders Are Not Immediately Appealable; Supervisory Review and Rule 1.7(a) Conflicts When Counsel Also Represents the Entity Case: Weigel v. Albertson, 2026 ND 4 (N.D. Jan....
Rule 11(a)(2) Enforcement: Conditional Plea Requires a Court Order and a Judgment that Expressly States “Conditional”

Rule 11(a)(2) Enforcement: Conditional Plea Requires a Court Order and a Judgment that Expressly States “Conditional”

Date: Jan 3, 2026
Rule 11(a)(2) Enforcement: Conditional Plea Requires a Court Order and a Judgment that Expressly States “Conditional” 1. Introduction In State v. Medina, 2025 ND 234, the North Dakota Supreme Court...
Modification of Nonparent Visitation Must Proceed Under N.D.C.C. § 14-09.4-14 (Even When the Parent Moves to Modify a Foreign Order)

Modification of Nonparent Visitation Must Proceed Under N.D.C.C. § 14-09.4-14 (Even When the Parent Moves to Modify a Foreign Order)

Date: Jan 3, 2026
Modification of Nonparent Visitation Must Proceed Under N.D.C.C. § 14-09.4-14 (Even When the Parent Moves to Modify a Foreign Order) I. Introduction Wardner v. Porath, 2025 ND 228, addresses which...
Parenting-Time Modification After In-State Relocation: Work-Availability Findings, Shively Distinguished, and “Immaterial Misstatements” Under Clearly-Erroneous Review

Parenting-Time Modification After In-State Relocation: Work-Availability Findings, Shively Distinguished, and “Immaterial Misstatements” Under Clearly-Erroneous Review

Date: Jan 3, 2026
Parenting-Time Modification After In-State Relocation: Work-Availability Findings, Shively Distinguished, and “Immaterial Misstatements” Under Clearly-Erroneous Review I. Introduction In Markestad v....
Post-Judgment Criminal Appealability Under N.D.C.C. § 29-28-06(5) Turns on the Nature of the Claim, Not Its Merits

Post-Judgment Criminal Appealability Under N.D.C.C. § 29-28-06(5) Turns on the Nature of the Claim, Not Its Merits

Date: Jan 3, 2026
Post-Judgment Criminal Appealability Under N.D.C.C. § 29-28-06(5) Turns on the Nature of the Claim, Not Its Merits Case: City of Williston v. Bauer, 2025 ND 231 Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota...
Partition Accounting in North Dakota: Trust-Exclusive Expenses Cannot Be Charged to a Cotenants’ Share; Rule 60(a) May Correct a Decree to Conform to an Adopted Referee Recommendation

Partition Accounting in North Dakota: Trust-Exclusive Expenses Cannot Be Charged to a Cotenants’ Share; Rule 60(a) May Correct a Decree to Conform to an Adopted Referee Recommendation

Date: Jan 2, 2026
Partition Accounting in North Dakota: Trust-Exclusive Expenses Cannot Be Charged to a Cotenants’ Share; Rule 60(a) May Correct a Decree to Conform to an Adopted Referee Recommendation 1. Introduction...
Requiring Detailed “Active Efforts” Findings in ICWA Termination Cases: Commentary on In the Interest of J.C., 2025 ND 217 (N.D. 2025)

Requiring Detailed “Active Efforts” Findings in ICWA Termination Cases: Commentary on In the Interest of J.C., 2025 ND 217 (N.D. 2025)

Date: Dec 20, 2025
Requiring Detailed “Active Efforts” Findings in ICWA Termination Cases: Commentary on In the Interest of J.C., 2025 ND 217 (N.D. 2025) I. Introduction The North Dakota Supreme Court’s decision in In...
State v. Jaeger: Clarifying Rule 36 Clerical Corrections of Jail Credit and the Absence of a Right to Counsel in Non‑Critical Sentencing Modifications

State v. Jaeger: Clarifying Rule 36 Clerical Corrections of Jail Credit and the Absence of a Right to Counsel in Non‑Critical Sentencing Modifications

Date: Dec 20, 2025
State v. Jaeger: Clarifying Rule 36 Clerical Corrections of Jail Credit and the Absence of a Right to Counsel in Non‑Critical Sentencing Modifications Introduction In State v. Jaeger, 2025 ND 222,...
Estate of Lepp: Finality, Timeliness, and Rule 54(b) in Unsupervised Probate Appeals

Estate of Lepp: Finality, Timeliness, and Rule 54(b) in Unsupervised Probate Appeals

Date: Dec 20, 2025
Estate of Lepp: Finality, Timeliness, and Rule 54(b) in Unsupervised Probate Appeals I. Introduction The North Dakota Supreme Court’s decision in Estate of Lepp, 2025 ND 216, is a jurisdictional...
Express Authority and Agent‑Amended Trusts under N.D.C.C. § 59‑14‑02(5): Commentary on Matter of William C. Hansen and Verna Hansen Trust, 2025 ND 220

Express Authority and Agent‑Amended Trusts under N.D.C.C. § 59‑14‑02(5): Commentary on Matter of William C. Hansen and Verna Hansen Trust, 2025 ND 220

Date: Dec 20, 2025
Express Authority and Agent‑Amended Trusts under N.D.C.C. § 59‑14‑02(5): Commentary on Matter of William C. Hansen and Verna Hansen Trust, 2025 ND 220 I. Introduction Matter of William C. Hansen and...
State v. Hoff (2025 ND 215): Functional Waiver of Counsel and the Necessity of Timely Faretta-Type Warnings

State v. Hoff (2025 ND 215): Functional Waiver of Counsel and the Necessity of Timely Faretta-Type Warnings

Date: Dec 20, 2025
State v. Hoff (2025 ND 215): Functional Waiver of Counsel and the Necessity of Timely Faretta-Type Warnings I. Introduction In State v. Hoff, 2025 ND 215 (N.D. Dec. 18, 2025), the North Dakota...
Kolstad v. Claussen: Explicit Findings Required on Developmental-Needs and Domestic-Violence Best-Interest Factors in North Dakota Custody Cases

Kolstad v. Claussen: Explicit Findings Required on Developmental-Needs and Domestic-Violence Best-Interest Factors in North Dakota Custody Cases

Date: Dec 20, 2025
Kolstad v. Claussen: Explicit Findings Required on Developmental-Needs and Domestic-Violence Best-Interest Factors in North Dakota Custody Cases I. Introduction In Kolstad v. Claussen, 2025 ND 213,...
Limiting Water Resource District Cost Assessments to Landowners: Commentary on Fairville Township v. Wells County Water Resource District, 2025 ND 209

Limiting Water Resource District Cost Assessments to Landowners: Commentary on Fairville Township v. Wells County Water Resource District, 2025 ND 209

Date: Dec 20, 2025
Limiting Water Resource District Cost Assessments to Landowners: Commentary on Fairville Township v. Wells County Water Resource District, 2025 ND 209 I. Introduction The North Dakota Supreme Court’s...
Abandonment, Incarceration, and Step-Parent Adoption: The Constitutional Application of N.D.C.C. § 14-15-01(1) in Adoption of G.M.H.

Abandonment, Incarceration, and Step-Parent Adoption: The Constitutional Application of N.D.C.C. § 14-15-01(1) in Adoption of G.M.H.

Date: Dec 20, 2025
Abandonment, Incarceration, and Step-Parent Adoption: The Constitutional Application of N.D.C.C. § 14-15-01(1) in Adoption of G.M.H. I. Introduction The North Dakota Supreme Court’s decision in...
MidFirst Bank v. Young: Mortgagors’ Lack of Standing to Challenge Mortgage Assignments and Limits on Restricting Access to Court Audio Recordings

MidFirst Bank v. Young: Mortgagors’ Lack of Standing to Challenge Mortgage Assignments and Limits on Restricting Access to Court Audio Recordings

Date: Dec 6, 2025
MidFirst Bank v. Young: Mortgagors’ Lack of Standing to Challenge Mortgage Assignments and Limits on Restricting Access to Court Audio Recordings I. Introduction The North Dakota Supreme Court’s...

    State v. Bell and the Unified Application of N.D.C.C. §§ 39‑20‑01 and 39‑20‑01.1
    in Serious-Injury and Fatal DUI Crash Investigations

State v. Bell and the Unified Application of N.D.C.C. §§ 39‑20‑01 and 39‑20‑01.1 in Serious-Injury and Fatal DUI Crash Investigations

Date: Dec 6, 2025
State v. Bell and the Unified Application of N.D.C.C. §§ 39‑20‑01 and 39‑20‑01.1 in Serious-Injury and Fatal DUI Crash Investigations I. Introduction State v. Bell, 2025 ND 201, is a significant...
State v. Martinez and the Discretionary Substitution of Jurors under N.D.R.Crim.P. 24(c)(1)

State v. Martinez and the Discretionary Substitution of Jurors under N.D.R.Crim.P. 24(c)(1)

Date: Dec 6, 2025
State v. Martinez and the Discretionary Substitution of Jurors under N.D.R.Crim.P. 24(c)(1) Introduction In State v. Martinez, 2025 ND 204, the North Dakota Supreme Court addressed an increasingly...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert